|
| |
|
Encounters with Asperger Syndrome in
the Solicitor's Office
By Dr. Venetia Young, Family Therapist
© 2001-2004
Jordan Publishing Company. All Rights Reserved
A client comes into your
office to ask whether you will represent him, as his wife wishes him to have
no more contact with their children following incidences of domestic
violence. You know that these episodes were quite severe and yet he appears
to have no remorse nor sympathy. He does not look you in the eye and so you
feel quite uncomfortable in his presence and wonder whether he is some kind
of psychopath. The second client of the morning is a puzzled looking man
whose wife wishes to divorce him and you find that the settlement is
complicated by this apparently intelligent man’s business failure. He does
not seem to understand his wife’s feelings and gets more and more distressed
the angrier she gets trying to explain his failures to him. The third client
is a 30-year-old man whose parents have brought him to you as he had exposed
himself to two small children in a playground. This had never happened
before. The young man appears oblivious to the potential effect on the
children. His parents are respectable people showing appropriate levels of
concern. They then tell you that the young man has Asperger’s Syndrome (AS)
and that he does not understand the consequences of what he has done. You
think that they are probably over-indulgent middle-class parents spoiling
him. But something about the presentation of all three clients makes you
curious.
I am not a solicitor. I am a
family therapist working in a psychotherapy department in Carlisle. All
three of these stories belong to past patients of mine where AS has been a
working diagnosis. The violent man has learnt empathy and about the
difference between his way of seeing things and that of his wife and
children. He knows now that he has to stop, be curious about every situation
and check out what other people’s points of view are. He then has to retreat
and take stock before testing out a measured response. His wife and children
are learning to trust him again. The failed businessman is very intelligent
and has taken on AS as a special interest. He has read widely on the subject
and practises empathy with his wife. He checks with her what she would like
him to do and occasionally works it out for himself. She is delighted and
although their grown-up children have suffered from the hardship of the
financial ruin, they can all now talk on a similar wavelength. The
young man met with the police who carefully and quietly explained the
consequences of his actions and checked that he had understood. They
explained the consequences of a repeated act of exposure and the
ramifications of that. The children’s families had the diagnosis
explained to them and were happy not to press charges unless there was a
repeat offence. The young man has learnt a little more about right and wrong
and how society works. His parents were hugely relieved that the whole
episode was conducted calmly, as he panics and cannot process information if
the emotional atmosphere is highly charged. In none of these three cases had
AS been diagnosed in childhood.
What is AS and how does it
present in adults? It is due to a specific brain abnormality, the cause of
which can be either genetic, brain insult or brain disease (such as a head
injury or meningitis). It is much more common in males. Lorna Wing has
described a triad of impairment of reciprocal social interaction, non-verbal
communication and imaginative activity. Even very academically intelligent
people may be affected, as AS is a social intelligence problem. AS may
underlie the diagnoses of schizoid and anti-social personality disorders,
schizophrenia and manic depression. Many patients have been through many
diagnostic labels (as had the young man who exposed himself). What should
you, as a legal practitioner, look for?
(1) Impairment in reciprocal
social interaction
 |
egocentric and isolated,
appear eccentric; |
 |
bluntness and fragility; |
 |
no small talk; |
 |
poor intimate relationships; |
 |
pedantic language; |
 |
inappropriate or odd social
behaviors; |
 |
poor conversational turn
taking; |
 |
talking in monologues. |
(2) Impairment of non
verbal communication:
 |
poor eye contact; |
 |
misreading other's emotions; |
 |
poverty of facial
expression; |
 |
monotonous speech. |
(3) Poor imaginative
ability:
 |
lack of awareness of the
consequences of actions - money, employment; |
 |
preference for rigid
routines - often obsessional; |
 |
inflexible; |
 |
special interest, especially
trains, timetables, lists; |
 |
exceptional memory for
facts. |
(4) Other features:
 |
clumsiness / gaucheness; |
 |
increased incidence of
anxiety, depression, psychosis; |
 |
hyper-sensitivity or
hypo-sensitivity to emotional and other sensory experiences. |
Having identified some of
these features, how should you manage the situation? It is unlikely
that you will get the person in front of you to agree about the diagnosis,
as the sufferer is seldom aware that he has a problem (although he often
thinks others have a problem). However, the information about the
client that you have observed can help you to respond appropriately to get a
speedier and easier result in consultation. Here are some do's and
don'ts:
 |
Keep the emotional
atmosphere calm. |
 |
Be curious rather than
critical. |
 |
Explain everything carefully
and in great detail. |
 |
Written/visual information
may be more easily assimilated. |
 |
Allow time for information
to sink in. |
 |
Clear up misunderstandings /
misperceptions as they arise. |
 |
Use straightforward,
unambiguous language. |
Family therapists often use a
particular variety of questions called circular questions to aid AS
sufferers’ curiosity, which helps them to understand puzzling situations.
More importantly, it helps clients to get a different view of the situations
they find themselves in. This is crucial for a person with AS, as they are
hooked into an egocentric view of life. So saying something ike: ‘This must
be puzzling for you to understand as it is a complex social situation you
find yourself in. I wonder what other people may be thinking. If your
daughters had a completely different view of this, how would you make sense
of that?’. This acknowledges the problem in a non-blaming way and invites
curiosity, that there could be alternative explanations. It also gives the
client some control over thinking of different points of view. Another
useful phrase is: ‘What else might that mean?’ – so that a lot of different
interpretations could emerge and the most likely one get chosen. The fragile
world of the person with AS means that they often take control of everything
in one way or another. This dynamic makes ordinary professional
conversations a challenge.
If the client wants a
therapist to talk to about their issues, it is essential that the
professional has a working understanding of AS. Most AS sufferers and their
partners have had a very bumpy ride through therapy. Many therapies,
especially couple therapies, work on the assumption that free expression of
affect is vital. This causes the person with AS to clam up with terror and
the therapy usually then founders in complete misunderstanding. The person
should go to his GP and ask for referral to the local psychological services
department, although many psychologists and psychotherapists are not
familiar with adult presentations of AS. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy has
been shown to work with this.

This article can not be reproduced or sold.
Entire Article:
Encounters with Asperger Syndrome in
the Solicitor's Office

The above article was
published in the
Family Law Review in September of 2001. ASPIRES thanks Dr. Venetia
Young and offers a "special" thanks to
Jordon Publishing for granting
ASPIRES the honor of reproducing this article for our community.
Reprinted with permission.

 |
|